Canons of journalism take center stage at all times. They also serve as a “moral guide,” not only the journalists but also the people outside of the media industry. There is nothing to worry about, as long as the writer’s conscience is very clear. In the end, nobody can question the campus writers because they follow what they think is right for the benefits of everyone.
If it is not properly disseminated and well-presented, the tendency is that it becomes complicated and confusing because of its complexity and difficult journalistic lingo and other linguistic diversities. It also helps in augmenting vocabularies and learning how to utter English properly using the window of journalism as the other side of communicative approach. Most often, journalism book gives us much information without really dishing out its key role to society, as well as its practicality of learning.
It must be clear further about its commitment. Again, canons of journalism must be put into actions by committing something “prolific” in favor of the majority, i.e. memory or percipience that leads to significance and dynamism. They should be dredged up and studied first before writers are opted in journalistic genre to dish out interesting facts to the reading public.